BEWARE THE SCAM-2

Thursday, February 19, 2015

HOW LONG SHOULD A NOVEL BE?

If you don’t read the blog of Dean Wesley Smith, you missed a good post recently. It’s from his updated writing book, KILLING THE SACRED COWS OF PUBLISHING, where, chapter by chapter, he points out that some things beginning writers are told, as if they’re etched into stone tablets, are flat wrong. In fact, they’re myths.

Smith points out that length used to be a criterion for whether a book was acceptable. Some traditional publishers still use length as a guide for whether they’ll consider publishing something, and that can severely limit an author’s ability to tell the story he wants to tell. Having been a published author for many years, Smith remembers when books suddenly had to be very long - 80,000 to 100,000 words - or not considered worthy. That was a hoax because the truth was those publishers were faced with rising expenses and needed to make more money. Their scheme was to publish longer books and charge more for them.

Now, thanks to self-publishing and small presses, authors are free from being forced to write to a certain length. Which is a good thing. Smith offers a list of famous novels which were less than 40,000 words long and enjoyed great popularity and acclaim. Here are some of them:

Jack London’s CALL OF THE WILD
John Steinbeck’a OF MICE AND MEN
George Orwell’s ANIMAL FARM
Robert Louis Stevenson’s DR. JECKYLL AND MISTER HYDE
Charles Dickens’ A CHRISTMAS CAROL
H.G. Wells’ THE TIME MACHINE
Philip Roth’s GOODBYE COLUMBUS
Joseph Conrad’s HEART OF DARKNESS
Stephen King’s SHAWSHANK REDEMPTION
Ira Levin’s THE STEPFORD WIVES
John Steinbeck’s THE PEARL
Norman MacLean’s A RIVER RUNS THROUGH IT

This is only a partial list, and it can be argued that many of these novels are quite old, written before publishers decided to raise book prices as a way to avoid having to leave their expensive New York offices. But the desire and necessity to write short is growing. Today’s readers want to use their I-Pads, even telephones, to catch up on the latest romance or thriller from their favorite author. “Short is the new long” is the slogan of today. And that doesn’t mean the reader can’t have an excellent reading experience. After all, the author, not some publisher, is the better judge of the “right” length for her story.

Blog reader/author: Do you write shorter books than you formerly did? Do you find them more, or less, popular than your other work?

2 comments:

  1. Hi Phyllis,

    We're still constrained by economics. If a story is sold for less than 2.99 on Amazon, the % to the author is cut in half. If an author writes a novella, it's difficult to sell it for any more than 99 cents. However at 2.99, this is where a short novel could do really well and for a decent return on the author's investment of blood, sweat, tears and time.

    Bob

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bob, I think novellas sell for $1.99, not 99 cents. At least the Kindle Worlds novellas sell for that price. And I'm about to launch my own novellas at $1.99 too. They're 100 pages, about 25,000 words, which seems fair to me. A short novel of 30,000 or 40,000 words should be $2.99. And I enjoy writing the shorter length. Back in my trad pub days, I hated having to lengthen a romance novel to 60,000.

      Delete

Speak to me! I'm listening!